Hello Dear Reader! Just a quick post to say Thank You to the Arizona SQL Server User Group and to my home town nortth Orlando user group OPASS!
This week I was very lucky to present Inside the Query Optimizer to the AZ SSUG and Performance Tuning, NOW! to OPASS. I had promised to get my decks and demo's live and I wanted to do that.
Click Here for the Deck for Inside the Query Optimizer, and here for Demo's.
Click Here for the Deck for Performance Tuning, NOW!, and here for Demo's.
AZ to FL and back again. I believe next week I'll just rest :).
Seriously Thank you to the wonderful SSUG leaders, Matt & Amy in AZ, and Shawn, Karla, and Rodney in my home town.
Without you this isn't possible! And Dear Attendee's Thank You, if you have any questions please feel free to shoot me an email.
As always Thanks for stopping by.
Thanks,
Brad
Thursday, June 26, 2014
It's not Business, It's Personal
Hello Dear Reader. I find
myself at this late hour unable to sleep. Yesterday the slate of speakers
for the PASS Summit was announced. What should have been a happy moment
was quickly darkened by the words of people that I know well within the SQL
Server Community.
I would ask the MVP's and others in
the SQL Server Community; Did you plan on intimidating new speakers
yesterday?
Because you did. I have a few first
time speaker that I've been working with. Not first time PASS Speakers, first time period. Encouraging and mentoring them
to get involved in SSUG's and SQL Saturday's. At the beginning of the
year I told one in particular that we should work on a plan so she would have
the experience to submit to the PASS Summit this year.
Her first words to me when we spoke
yesterday? "Thank God I didn't submit, because the MVP's would be
talking smack about me right now!"
Wonderful work growing the next
generation of SQL Server Speakers. Is this what community has become?
It seems every year with the speaker
selection process the people I would normally count on as pillars in our
community take the opportunity to bash the process.
If the process is broken so be it.
We should discuss that. WE SHOULD NOT LEVEL PERSONAL ATTACKS.
That is ill befitting of the
responsibility that we as speakers have in the community.
I remember what it was like to
be a simple DBA that looked at speakers at conferences with awe and wonder.
Instead of being a community where we encourage new speakers, what.... we
encourage new speakers as long as they all are from different companies?
By attacking Pragmatic Works and
suggesting that the speakers did anything less than earn their spots, you
demean the volunteers, my co-workers, anyone who works for my company, and you
demean me.
There were a couple issues that
occurred yesterday that compounded one another. The presentation that occurred
during the 24 Hours of PASS that I moderated, see Brent's blog.
Then Kendal a former board member
who had knowledge of the process. Who praised the volunteers and the way
the process works, as noted by absentee presenters who didn't receive sessions
this year how a speakers name did not guarantee a spot. He instead
implied that something improper had happened. Here's his blog.
Until he accused me of having no integrity and not deserving my sessions
it was a pretty interesting read, click here.
Here's the part to pay attention
to:
- "3
Preconference sessions by Pragmatic Works employees are on the list,
including one delivered by PASS Executive Vice President, Finance &
Governance Adam Jorgensen who is also President and Managing Partner of
Pragmatic Works. I know a lot of folks that work at Pragmatic and they're
good at what they do, but having 3 precon
sessions (where presenters usually make good money from the sales)
selected for the same company as one of PASS's execs...smells.
I'd like to give PASS the benefit of doubt on this one, but I'll it's very
hard to ignore, even if Adam wasn't one of the presenters."
HOW DO YOU HANDLE IT?
First I reacted in his comment
sections. I was mad and I called what he wrote Bullshit. I stand by
that.
I've reached out to Kendal. I
hope to talk to him soon. This shouldn't be a conversation on Twitter or
over the blog-o-sphere. I know him, I consider him a friend, and this
accusation is beneath him and regardless of the intention it is deeply personal
to me.
I reached out to Brent. Brent
and I DM'ed very very ridiculously late at night. Brent I can't thank you
enough for taking the time to reply. I hope to talk to you soon!
I completely understand Brent with
the 24 HOP. The reason I reached out to him was because of his comment on
Kendal's blog.
In the comment's Brent
had this reply:
We discussed 2 different
issues over DM. One is the transparency of the process the other was the
selection. Giving vendors preferential treatment, and that this wasn’t
the case here. Brent didn't have an
issue with the Pragmatic Works folks having sessions and understood the level
of community involvement that we have.
His issue was
transparency. I was really glad we could discuss this, in-digital-person.
Concerns like that should be communicated amongst friends so false
insults do not fly. I consider Brent a
friend, it meant a lot that he made himself so readily available to chat. It is what I would hope for in a friend.
This is how we should
handle these things. If you have a concern with something I'm doing,
reach out to me.
I remember well what it
was like to be a simple DBA that looked at speakers at conferences with awe and
wonder. Seeing people like Brian Kelly and Andy Warren, both of whom I
know, comment on this blog and not try to reign in the personal attacks is
disheartening. Andy’s were not inflammatory,
but they also did nothing to suggest I or my other co-workers were above the
board.
I understand I haven't
been at this as long as you guys. I'm not an MVP. I've only been
speaking the last couple years.
As a somewhat new member
to all of this, I would ask the people that are supposed to be respected Sr.
members of the community to conduct themselves with a little more Integrity.
If you know me. Yet you would say these type of things about
me, how does that make new people feel looking at our community from the
outside. Do you believe it makes them
want to volunteer and participate in it?
INTEGRITY
My father taught me as a
child you only have your integrity once and you should not waste it. This
means something to me. When I invest in something, I invest
wholeheartedly. I cannot love with half my heart. I cannot commit
to something while sitting on the fence. If I did not earn something then I do
not want it.
The greatest things that
we get in life are the things we struggle to achieve. It is only through
the labor of the struggle that the fruits of success are realized.
This year I have
presented 26 times. From New Hampshire, to Boston, to Puerto Rico, to Orange
County CA, to Denver, to Phoenix, to Atlanta, to Portland, Tampa, Orlando, and
more. I have done deep dives, pre-con's, 1 day sessions, 2 day sessions,
5 day sessions, and this doesn't even include customer presentations.
This is all community.
I have evangelized to
user groups and individuals about how they should get involved, present,
participate. I discuss with them how it will help them and help their
career.
I would once again point
to my co-worker who has not yet delivered their first SQL Community presentation
said to me "And you wonder why new people feel intimidated.
I would hate it if they were talking about me".
IT’S NOT BUSINESS IT’S
PERSONAL
We've all heard the
phrase before "it's not personal its business". It is typically
used as the justification for doing some pretty crappy stuff.
There are some people
out there that believe participating in the SQL Community is all about
marketing. That it's business. Being out there and participating gets
them business. If it is business to them, fine. It's not to me.
To me the SQL Community is personal.
Right now I am away from
home. I'm away from my kids. I presented at a user group in AZ last
night. I didn't get paid for it, I didn't get "new" business
leads. As a matter of fact I spent 15 minutes of my 1 hour presentation
encouraging people to volunteer.
Why? Because I
love this community. I have received a lot in my life from the SQL
Community. I have a job I love, I've made new friends, and I’ve traveled
to new places, volunteered in ways I never imagined possible.
I truly believe that
within every person there is a story waiting to be told that we all want to
hear. It could be brought to life during a presentation on Professional
Development, a passionate Deep Dive, or a harrowing tale of lessons learned in
the trenches. When I present I tell people there is a story in each of
them that I would love to hear. They just need to have the faith in
themselves to present and the possibilities of what they can do from there are
endless.
This isn't business to
me. I would never invest this much time into something I didn't love.
It's personal.
Suggesting that I
submitted to the same process as anyone else and received preferential
treatment isn't business. It's personal. And it's wrong.
I hope from here we can
clear the air. If anyone would like to
talk to me about this I’m happy to. From
here on out though please separate criticism of the processes from those that
are here for all the right reasons.
As always Dear Reader,
Thanks for stopping by.
Thanks,
Brad
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)